Important
corrections to the article:
1) Dr. Craton wasn't just a chiropractor; he was an
independent
researcher as well. FYI:
Ultimately he had to turn his back
on
the chiropractic profession due to that profession's
unwillingness
to embrace badly needed change. He had
disproved
the so-called "science" of chiropractic and knew its
basic
tenet [of SPINAL MANIPULATION to correct
VERTEBRAL
SUBLUXATIONS in order to remove
nerve
interference (correct term: "nerve signal interference")]
to
be a fraud.
2) Craton discovered
through studying a human skeleton
rather than a plastic
copy, that the first vertebra upon
which the head sits has,
not two, but four facets
for
articulation with
the head.
3) The mentioned manipulation of the head is
actually a
specific
adjustment that brings the head back to center
and into a proper articulation with the atlas.
4)
The Palmer
School of Chiropractic was in Davenport, Iowa.
Is NSIR chiropractic?
The chiropractic profession refused to learn Dr.
Craton's methods as they needed
to and the
regulatory
agencies refused to improve their paradigm
and
raise their standards. Dr. Craton's life's research is
fortunately
still alive and well, and was passed through his
family line. Unfortunately, change
comes about slowly and
the chiropractic
field is apparently threatened financially,
(a
populace that does not seek chiropractic "care" would
NOT
replenish chiropractic's hefty bankroll). They have
chosen
to actively fight this badly needed change, and have
wrongly
accused the only true practitioner in Craton's
unique
life's research in the world of practicing
chiropractic
medicine without a license [the ONLY claim
they
can make in order to continue (they've been successful
for
nearly 40 years already)] to suppress Dr. Craton's
unique
research. To date, we are still in this legal battle and
are
looking for any chiropractor who would be willing to blow
the
whistle on the chiropractic fraud in a court of law.
What we are offering is a unique philosophy/method and
higher
standard for achieving health and well being for the
suffering
and defrauded public that STILL has a RIGHT
to
choose the TRUE form of Dr. Craton's life's work.
We
are still hoping to create a large following of practitioners
and
are no longer just offering to teach Dr. Craton's work
to
the chiropractors. The chiropractic profession truly had
its
chance to do the right thing and straighten up its morals
and
its practices, and now the PROFESSION has missed
the
proverbial "boat". I understand that the law does allow
for
me to legally work under another practitioners wing,
at
least that is what I was told by the Medical Staff
Coordinator
in a local hospital when she wanted to bring
me
on staff there, in my specialty. And, even with
the
temporary injunction in place, and that disclosure
made
known, still more chiropractors have requested that I work
on
them. Apparently my service to a doctor is legal
(if,
as discovered, I am allowed to legally work under their
wing).
Why isn't the public legally being allowed
as much?! The
State's claim is that this
is a matter of "public safety". Well IF
the State is really
interested in public safety then they would
advise the chiropractors
to straighten up their morals and
their
ways and cause the chiropractors to make the
responsible
improvement that we have demanded of them for
the
last 25 years. Instead, the State has apparently thrown
taxpayers'
money into this job of quashing the truth and has
worked
together with the Chiropractic Board in order to
construct
a lie in the Court. When I spoke to the Assistant
Attorney
General who is behind this effort when I
approached
the Chiropractic Board head-on from 2000
on,
his implied statement was that Dr. Craton's work
was
worthy of the Nobel Prize. What is wrong with this picture?
From the beginning of time, whilst Mankind was still in the
Garden,
even God knew the absolute importance (necessity?)
of
allowing for the freedom of choice. Why has the State
assumed
and claimed more knowledge than the Creator
Himself?!
Is the State really so wise?! Hasn't the State
forgotten
about the Ninth and Tenth Articles of the
Bill
of Rights? My Declaration has been
on the State's desk
since November 2000. In fact, it was this Declaration
that
finally forced the State to respond
to my demands for
the
chiropractic field's improvement.
Apparently the Bill of
Rights still held
some weight back in 2000. But what about
now?
Hasn't the State forgotten about the First Amendment
as
well? Dr. Craton's unique life's research had to take the
path
of becoming a religion in order to secure it's place in the
sun.
It is obvious in our web site, as well as my original
resolution and challenge
to the chiropractic Board, that our
ideals
and philosophies are steeped in spirituality/religious
experience.
And, our final required push to cause the
chiropractic
profession to become honest took place on
Millenium,
when the Spirit moved so dramatically upon the
Earth.
In fact, my meeting with the Chiropactic Board in
their
chambers to tell them outright that their "vertebral
subluxation"
was nothing more than a "sacred cow" took
place
on January 19, 2001. Just ten days earlier, I had
 witnessed
a rainbow in what I had been told was
an extremely powerful
full moon and was inspired
to create one of the many rainbow graphics on
the
web site. Point of interest: the
white lines in the
graphic shown are
representative of the Star of David.
There
are two stars depicted in a spiral embrace.
I never claimed to be a chiropractor, and I don't, never have,
and
never will, practice chiropractic as it is today!!
And quite
frankly I believe that if they haven't
straightened up their
act by now, they never will.
Chiropractic is a fraud that seeks
undue
financial gain. It is a "science" that was built on a
pseudo-religion
(a lie), and that "science" has been proven
false,
more than 20 years ago. When a theory is proven
wrong
then the scientific method clearly states that the theory
must
be abondoned. Chiropractic leaders have instead made
the
effort to redefine the basis ("vertebral subluxation") for
their
existence and have concocted a convoluted definition
for
what they treat (the "vertebral subluxation", which now,
due
to my efforts, they have made the move to even change
the
TERM to something else). They recently claimed in the
Court
that the updated term was "segmental dysfunction"
and
that they were making the effort to "fit more to the
medical
model". They have WILLFULLY failed to
acknowledge
publicly the truth of the matter, that a
subluxation
is only a partial dislocation, which IS the medical
definition/model.
This is no surprise since the chiropractic
literature has
repeatedly explained that the "chiropractic
subluxation"
meaning "vertebral subluxation" does NOT
mean
a partial dislocation. Obviously chiropractic's leaders
are
mostly corrupt, or, for whatever reason, (maybe they're
embarrassed,
or maybe they've got political pressure put on
them, or
maybe they're liable for the recall that they should
have
and didn't order for the chiropractic profession, etc.),
they
won't stand up against the blatant lies that have been
propagated
for more than a century now. They are doctors
after
all, and doctors know everything ... don't they? I wish
the
Court would be so wise. It is not hard to see through
the
chiropractic facade; their storefront is peeling by now
and
in major need of repair. Why should the Court believe
that
Chiropractic has the know how to clean up their act on
their
own? Obviously, they truly don't know where to start.
If
they did know, then they would have already done a proper
job
by now, and especially since they took a whole three
years
to let the press (01/19/2004) know that I was a
force
to be reckoned with after all. And
I'm sorry, but the idea of
changing the
classic chiropractic term of "vertebral
subluxation"
to "segmental dysfunction" in order to "fit the
medical
model" is just laughable when all they have to do to
"fit
the medical model" is FINALLY admit that a subluxation
is
a partial dislocation, and no, vertebrae cannot partially
dislocate.
And then if they really wanted to do the right thing,
they
would admit to the Court that there is another cause
(that
we have repeatedly told them about) that the
chiropractors
either missed, or chose to ignore, as to why the
spinal
column does what it does (shifts to accomodate for
stressors
directly above, below, and around the spine). Time
will
only tell if the chiropractors will come clean on this
subject,
and until they do, they will continue to rip off and
endanger
the public as they've already done for how many
decades
now? One more time ... our efforts to cause the
chiropractic
profession to become honest, and raise their
standards,
have obviously been earnest for the last twenty
five
(25) years. And they've known that Dr. Craton had a
knowledge
of the human body that was superior to their own
since
(documented) 1954.
And finally, I have been asked recently in deposition on
one
of my court cases about my
understanding of Dr. Craton's
work.
I had to admit that I saw his life's research as the work
of
Jesus Christ, after all, Jesus too, understood how to
effect
healing with a wisdom in His touch. The opposing
attorney
didn't seem to think that my understanding was
strange
in the least. Maybe I do know myself after all. I wish
the
"authoritative" world would respect as much. It IS my
right/responsibility
to follow the path that I feel that God
has
called me to, and as I was told by an older lady who was
well
respected in the church: sanctification is a matter for the
individual,
and only the individual can decide on the
sanctification
... that personal and inviolable walk with God
(Truth).
Why do you think that the First Amendment begins
as
it does? Even America's money still states: "In God We
Trust".
Now if only the Court would act accordingly, and
realize
that doctors ARE NOT GOD. In fact, in this case,
they
are in bed with a bunch of fabricated lies, and what
really
disturbs me, is that the Assistant Attorney General
for
Oklahoma that represents the chiropractors here, is in
that
same bed too. I guess I'm still doe-eyed hoping that the
State
(via Grant Moak, Assistant Attorney General) would
do
the right thing and get out of that bed of lies. Inevitably,
his
choice to stay in the lie (if that is what he chooses to do)
will
be a black mark on the State of Oklahoma. I'm not
backing
down. I know the truth, and I'm not crazy as so many
have
tried to say. Am I honest? Unfortunately, brutally so ...
which
is probably the problem in the end; the State has
constructed
for itself this illusion of authority (being right).
Unfortunately,
that illusory mindset brings on a corruption
of
the absolute power that they have claimed. They have
made
themselves responsible for the "safety of the public",
to
the exclusion of the public's free choice, and the only
parties
that I am legally allowed to "demonstrate" on are the
doctors,
who of course, have already blocked Dr. Craton's
life's
research from reaching the public. The only valid reason
why
they would have a responsibility to block Dr. Craton's
unique
research from reaching the public is if I had hurt one
of
them. Did I hurt one of them? No, I did not! In fact, I was
able
to help them when their chiropractic colleagues could
NOT
do as much. Again, what is wrong with this picture?!
Corruption? Perhaps ...
|
